Log in

No account? Create an account
Share Next Entry
Carved logo
theljstaff wrote in lj_policy
Welcome to lj_policy!

We're glad you're here. This community will be used to gather your opinions about social and community policy.

We understand that there is a lot to absorb and process right now with the creation of LiveJournal, Inc. Since this is a transition for all of us, we want to initiate a dialogue with you, the users. We feel it is very important to hear your concerns before we release any changes to current policies, and we want to start this process right away.

As a starting point, we don't want to just guess what's important to you; we want to hear about it directly from you. Please take a moment to answer the questions below:

1) What is your greatest concern about LiveJournal's current policies?

2) Regarding your primary concern, are you aware of a site that handles that issue in a way that you like?

This is just a starting point to get your initial ideas. We know you have a lot more where these come from, and in the coming days and weeks we will make sure you have a chance to voice your opinions. We look forward to your comments.

  • 1

I seem to recall that the homoeroticism of the content that got ponderosa121 tos'd was mentioned a couple of times during the discussion between her and the review 'board'(who, evidently, was one dude named Chris). As in-- the image might not have been "without redeeming artistic value" in his eyes, if it were a heterosexual couple.

IF what you are now saying is true, and I have no doubt that it is, I would like to see that statement made explicit in the TOS. So that ew would have something to point to when your volunteer review staff try to impose their personal judgements on us.

  • 1